Showing posts with label Assignment 2. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Assignment 2. Show all posts

Sunday, March 16, 2014

Reflections on tutor report from Assignment 2

The headlines from the my tutor’s feedback on the second DFP assignment are:

“I feel that this is pretty successful in achieving that major aim of the assignment to get you to make a short film that creates an atmosphere from the visual elements in the shooting.”

“I think you need to ask yourself if the movie itself in total tells us something we don’t already know, or at least think we know …does it tell us as much as it could about being that particular wheelchair user; could it be even more personal? It may be that you need to exaggerate or repress certain elements to achieve this, even to totally inventing something to do it.”

I think I understand what Peter is getting at here and, although I cannot immediately think of how I could have achieved this specifically, this idea will help me going forward.

What seemed to work well…

  • Ensuring that people do not feel sorry for Matt and avoiding comedic levels of anger or frustration
  • Shadows from the blinds looking like prison bars to accentuate sense of confinement from disability
  • Peter liked how there was no clue to Matt’s physical state in the first shot - I hadn't thought about this before
  • Shot 3 – the view of the skirting board seemed to be a hit with everyone
  • I seem to have managed to show the repetitiveness of the struggle but by creating new situations (eg shot 3 compared with shot 7) so not boring
  • The choppy editing in shot 9
  • The smoothing of the duvet over the red towel
  • The feeling of confidence and control when Matt puts his music on (Peter thought it was acceptable for this to be considered as diegetic as it was not a soundtrack as such and did not have a major effect in setting the overall mood of the sequence.)
  • The few seconds of contemplation at the end of the sequence


General comments

Re: having to edit down the sequence to fit within the timeframe: “Often tightening up is beneficial to the overall project, however long or short it is.”

Always have more footage than you need as re-shooting or filling in is not good.

“As you get more advanced in your audio editing – perhaps with more advanced software or simply more experience with what you have – you will be able to add different sound clips from sources other than the camera and/or recorded at a different time. This can give you much greater control.”

Areas to consider and develop

Whilst acknowledging that it is good to “make work about what you know”, Peter has suggested that as I progress I should “stretch that idea at least to breaking point and beyond!”

Shot 4 – view of the shower curtain.  The comments were:  “You might like to think about how this scene relates to all those other shower scenes that we are familiar with. Do these connections add to or detract from what you are setting out to do?”

I had wanted to build some anticipation and highlight our sense of voyeurism and I think this was partly achieved. I can see now that this might come across as a bit of a parody if the viewer was thinking of Psycho. And it is a rather overworked device, I suppose.

Action points

Peter was very supportive of my comment that I need spend a lot more time actually shooting and editing sequences. I need to set myself some targets for this, whilst leaving enough time to work through the exercises and keep on top of the mind-expanding theory stuff.

I have finally worked out how to add ‘labels’ to create a navigation menu. I have broken this down into: Assignments; Exercises; Experiments; Film reviews; Interesting links; Reflections; Research and Study visits.  This is already feels better – I can see where the weak spots are on my blog (although a lot of these areas have been covered in my handwritten log/course folder) and I have a renewed sense of purpose!

Suggested reading/viewing

BFI box set of films from the British Documentary Movement between 1930 and 1950 that are well worth studying:

For a different take on narrative, Carol Morley:
http://vimeo.com/33157806 and if you want to take her further The Alcohol Years dvd is worth getting.

The shorts made as music videos by Michel Gondry, many (most?) rely on animation techniques but are still worth analysing. E.g. :


Comments from fellow students:


Stuart:  I liked the film! I was constantly wondering whether your husband was ‘acting’ or whether he’s really like that every morning. ;) There’s a really strong sense of frustration and annoyance throughout the whole film. I loved the way you also used close-ups of the wheelchair to portray frustration - we didn’t always have to see Matt’s face. For example, getting his chair stuck on the corner edge of the wall and having to shuffle his way back and round again - the audience could see the markings on the wall where he’d had to do this before, so it helps build up the feeling of frustration because we can see that it’s something he’s had to deal with often. And the same with coming backwards out of the bathroom door, having to get the wheelchair perfectly aligned with only 1cm either side of each wheel in order to get out - and all done as close-up’s again. Great stuff!

I think the only negative criticism about it from me is the focus - but that’s the down side of filming on the 2-inch screen on a DSLR. There were shots where the depth of field was so shallow that it felt like the wrong thing was in focus. For example, I think in one shot the dof was so shallow that your husband’s shoulders were in focus but his hair was blurred. It felt odd to see his head out of focus. I’d have probably put the alarm clock in focus during the opening shots until your husband woke up. Then we knew for sure where the sound was coming from - even though I’m guessing you added the sound as foley, did you?


Nico: Just watched your film and I must say that you did a really good job on it. As you said in your notes you did not want anyone to feel sorry for Matt but every viewer would have sympathised with him, where we leap out of bed and not even think about simple things like getting into/out of the shower/bed/bathroom, he does exert more effort into those tasks than an able person. 

I love the low angle shot at flood board level when he comes around the corner, its a very graphical shot and the fact that he has to do a two point turn around that corner makes it even stronger.

I think the effort it takes to leave the bathroom scene is very strong too, as the viewer you almost want to reach out help. I think both lighting and the sound of the chair here really helps and it ends nicely too with the chair coming towards camera.

In the dressing scene the bright yellow wall and even the light coming through the blind lifts the scene and even though we see that Matt has to work a lot harder to get dressed it does not feel oppressive. 

I like your ending too, I am a big fan of silhouettes as they are very graphical.

One thing I would suggest and I only say this because it took me a long time to convince myself because I got so worried about composition that I never wanted to move the thing. Try and add a bit of movement to the camera, not on every shot, and when you do it just very subtly, less is more, it may not work on every shot and you may not even like it to start with but when it does work it feels like cinema. 

You should be proud of your film, its got good framing, your sound is good but I believe the best part of it is that you started with a very strong story and that is what makes this film so compelling. So well done.

Saturday, February 1, 2014

Assignment 2: Creating atmosphere


My understanding of this assignment is to create atmosphere using mise-en-scène, camera angles, lighting, colour etc without relying on the subject matter to carry this.  The instructions are to combine a day-to-day activity with a ‘mood’ for example: making a cup of tea in a very paranoid way.

I wanted to produce a sequence that fulfilled the brief but which was not frivolous. And, as with the first assignment, I looked very close to home for my inspiration and acting talent.

My husband Matt broke his back in 1986 by jumping off a 120 foot high waterfall for kicks.  Suffering a T12 spinal cord injury, he has had to use a wheelchair ever since.  Matt told me once that a favourite part of his day is the few seconds when he first wakes up before he remembers he is paralysed. He also insists that paraplegics have to channel a certain level of anger to even get out of bed in the morning and this is what I wanted to capture.  

For the purpose of staying close to the brief, the activity is ‘getting up’ in the morning and the atmosphere/mood is ‘dogged determination’.

It was important to me that Matt would look strong and competent throughout – the aim of the sequence is definitely not for people to feel sorry for him.  

I wanted the lighting to be flat (or harsh) if possible. With the absence of suitable strip lighting, natural gloomy daylight had to suffice. The sun snuck out a couple of times but I used the Venetian blinds to cast shadows on Matt, almost like prison bars to accentuate his confinement though his disability.  

My directorial brief was to keep this as real as possible in terms of reactions – I did not want a comedic level of anger and frustration – and I can vouch for the realism in all the scenes. 






Analysis by shot

Shot 1: View from behind his back, Matt is soundly asleep and does not move for the first few moments of the alarm going off. It gets louder until he slams the off button.  There are a few more moments of stillness and silence and then he suddenly turns over onto his back.  We get a sense from his face that he is mentally preparing to do battle with the day. 

I wanted this shot to look cluttered to set the scene of a claustrophobic, frustrating process. We see wires and stuff hanging down, annoying dots embroidered onto the pillow case and a pulsating red light in the background. The Buddha statue was placed there partly for ironic purposes (as our protagonist is not tranquil, in the slightest) but also to show this anger is necessary for the person to keep going - it is not just part of his character.

Shot 2:  Matt is now in his chair and on the way to the shower. He manoeuvres himself around the tight corner of the bed, getting himself caught up in a towel hanging up. He struggles to free himself of the towel and throws it on the bed angrily. The towel is red to symbolise his anger. [I would have liked everything else in the room to be quite colourless but unfortunately, we have a very brightly painted flat.]  We catch sight of his grimacing face in the mirror. 




Shot 3: View of the skirting board as the wheels of his chair bang into the wall and then go past with the camera still focused on the scuffs on the paintwork (to emphasise the repetitiveness).  We hear him rolling down the hallway.





Shot 4: We have a soft-focus view of the shower curtain. This is to build some anticipation and highlight our sense of voyeurism.

Shot 5: Matt then yanks back the curtain to reach for a razor.  The sound of the water helps to add crackly tension here.


Shot 6: CU of Matt shaving. His jaw is set and we hear the scratching of the razor on his face. This brief respite of normality and intimacy will hopefully allow the viewer to develop empathy with our protagonist.




Shot 7: View from almost ground level behind his chair as he transfers into the chair. We then endure the frustration as he struggles to get the chair into the right position to roll out of the bathroom. I wanted this shot to be dark and clunky and slightly confusing so that we really feel every annoying jolt of the process.



Shot 8: View from the end of the bed as Matt transfers back onto the bed. I wanted some awkward framing here (partly to compensate for the warm yellow glow in the room!) and for Matt to be pushed over to the left with the oppressive angle of the shelving over to the right.



Shot 9: Filmed from the side of the bed, we see the various laborious stages of Matt getting dressed.  This was one long shot, which I edited down – I thought the choppy cuts would emphasise the tiresome exertion required for something as simple as getting dressed.  Those are actually the facial expressions he pulls in real life.



Shot 10: This is the point where we start to feel that Matt is winning. His expression is more placid as he makes the bed, covering up the red towel with the now smooth, white duvet.



Shot 11: The POV is behind Matt (as the viewer has hopefully developed empathy by now) and the closeness adds an edginess.  He sets up his MP3 player and we hear some shouty French rap as he puts in his headphones on.  The song is called La Rage by Keny Arkana – an anthem for Matt.  He turns off the light and rolls to the door.  We can sense his confidence and control.



Shot 12: The camera has followed Matt to the door and we now watch him struggle to get over the threshold and to reach back to close the door. This is a reminder that his day will continue to be fraught with all kinds of physical challenges.  He slams the door and we hear the jangle of the wind chimes, leaving us a few seconds of contemplation.





Critical analysis

Overall I am quite pleased with the finished result, although I am keen to get some critical feedback from other students and friends. I think it succeeds in showing how hard it is for a disabled person to do some of the simple things we take for granted and I believe I achieved that, to a significant degree, through the mise-en-scène.

It is reasonably well-paced, with some slower moments to convey the arduous tediousness of the process.

The whole sequence feels edgy and uncomfortable due to framing, camera angles, lighting and choppy editing. The version I was actually just about to submit was 4 minutes 26 seconds but luckily I re-read the assignment briefing before posting this. “It should be no more than three minutes long”.  And the re-edit has actually tightened it up considerably though and, I think, increased the sense of dogged determination of the activity portrayed!

So I have just learnt two very important lessons:
  1. Always re-read the brief several times BEFORE starting work. If I had been more aware of the very specific time restriction, I would have approached the shots and filming differently.
  2. It is amazing how much you can edit out when you absolutely have to without losing the sense of the sequence.  This means I must go through more self-interrogation of which frames/seconds are absolutely essential.  Less is more, as they say.

Matt mentioned that he thinks my directing skills have improved considerably since the last assignment. This was helped by having planned every shot carefully in advance so there were no moments of me dithering. 

The assignment brief specifies no music so I am hoping I can get away with the sounds from the MP3 player counting as diegetic.  I successfully altered the level of the music (which was actually coming from a small speaker on Matt’s lap) to correspond with when his first earbud goes in which I think works OK.


A couple of things I was not happy with:

Matt is out of focus in some of the shots (very noticeably in shot 2) which is distracting. I need to be much more careful where I am using a very shallow depth of field (50mm f1,4 lens).

The painted walls of our flat did not fit with the atmosphere I was trying to create. Some of the scenes just look too warm and cosy. 

There is one small continuity issue that I will not draw attention to, in the hope that nobody notices it.




All in all, I have learned a lot from the assignment and feel there is much to build on. I need to practise making these kind of sequences much more. The last few months have been very focused on theory and watching lots of movies and now I need to spend more timing actually doing!